STUDY OF BIOPHYSICAL AND STRUCTURAL MECHANISMS OF STUDY OF BIOPHYSICAL AND STRUCTURAL MECHANISMS OF RESISTANCE IN PIGEONPEA AGAINST POD BORER COMPLEX

Authors

  • B. L. JAT , K. K. DAHIYA
  • HARISH KUMAR
  • S. MANDHANIA

Keywords:

Biophysical, Structural resistance, Pigeonpea, Pod borer complex

Abstract

The maximum H. armigera and M. vitrata infestation was recorded in Pusa-992 (3.72% and 7.90%) and in D2 (1st week of July) sown crop with infestation of 4.54 and 13.08 per cent, respectively. Whereas, the infestation of pod fly, M. obtusa was maximum in Manak (2.72%) and 2.58 per cent pod infestation in D2 (1st week of July) sown crop. The infestation of pod borer complex was negatively associated with pod wall thickness (-0.909**, - 0.739*, -0.870*, -0.834*, -0.840*, -0.705* and -0.745*) and non-glandular type A (-0.730*, -0.945**, -0.768*, -0.766*, -0.923** and -0.728*) and (-0.751*, -0.759*, 0.766*, -0.852*, -0.802*, -0.895** and -0.832*) glandular type B (-0.864*, -0.734*, -0.871* and -0.858*) and (-0.729*, -0.705*, -0.730* and -0.845*) density of pod trichomes of top and middle canopy of the plant. Fat (-0.884**, -0.754*, -0.743*, -0.871* and -0.750*) phenol (-0.900** and -0.806*) and tannin (-0.792*, -0.812* and -0.763*) content showed negative correlation with the pod infestation, whereas, crude protein (0.740*, 0.881**, 0.734*, 0.810*, 0.823*, 0.856*, 0.844* and 0.711*) and total soluble sugar (0.738*, 0.792*, 0.793*, 0.898**, 0.714*, 0.816*, 0.888** and 0.819*) showed positive association. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the variety Pusa-992 and Manak was most susceptible to the pod borers.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-12

How to Cite

K. K. DAHIYA, B. L. J. , HARISH KUMAR, & S. MANDHANIA. (2018). STUDY OF BIOPHYSICAL AND STRUCTURAL MECHANISMS OF STUDY OF BIOPHYSICAL AND STRUCTURAL MECHANISMS OF RESISTANCE IN PIGEONPEA AGAINST POD BORER COMPLEX. The Bioscan, 13(2), 561–568. Retrieved from https://thebioscan.com/index.php/pub/article/view/2006